Cement Industry Environmental Consortium
tadalafil generico -
- kamagra españa
Home Reports Members CIEC Contacts Ongoing Research Biosolids Report Greenhouse gas Request for Proposal Links
MINUTES
CIEC BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
Wednesday, December 15, 2011 @ 10:00AM
Mojave Desert AQMD Offices
14306 Park Ave., Victorville, CA. 92392
Attendees:
Bud Biggs, Mitsubishi Cement Absent
Frank Sheets, TXI Present
Chuck Fryxell, MDAQMD Absent
Gene Moscaret, Moscaret Associates Present
Eldon Heaston, MDAQMD Present
Robert Kniss, SCE Present
Terry Caldwell, Caldwell, Kennedy & Porter Absent
Jackelin Simmons, Cemex Absent
Amarjits Gill, Cemex Absent
Derrick Nicholls, Lehigh Southwest Absent
Mark Cunningham, PG&E (Via phone)
David Long, CIEC Present
1. Frank Sheets chaired the meeting in Bud Biggs absence. The minutes were pproved as sent.
1. Any questions related to the submittals should be provided to Mr. Long by January 9, 2006.
2. A conference call among the Board members is scheduled for January 11, 2006 at 10AM.
3. Mr. Biggs would negotiate any contract with the selected candidate.
4. Selection would be made no later then January 16th.
There was a general discussion on the attributes of the two candidates and consensus that each person had skill sets that would fit well with overall CIEC objectives. It was also agreed that what the approach the Board might decide on for moving forward with major CIEC projects might be the determining factor on the selection of the candidate. Bob Kniss indicated a preference for Ms. McQueen’s strong technical background in cement technologies, especially as the focus of the Technology Committee in 2006 would be in evaluating energy efficiencies
Mr. Sheets indicated that the decision on relocation had not been made as was in part determined by the selection of the Executive Director. Maintaining the office at the existing location had the benefit of not having to change mailing address and phone numbers.
8. Carbon Dioxide Project Update – Long/Sheets
A. Climate Registry Protocols for the Cement Industry were approved. Mr. Sheets indicated that since the protocols had adopted nearly all of the suggestions provided by the PCA that there was little controversy over the rules. He stated that it was his opinion that these protocols would at some point in the future be the basis of regulation, and that the Registry would eventually be folded into the Air Resources Board.
B. Demonstration Project Costs – Mr. Long indicated that the project cost for
A 500 lb/day (90 day period) would approximately be double the cost of having the demonstration facilities built at proponent’s facilities. The project cost outline for both the Phase I and II that were previously distributed to Energy Commission member was included with the Agenda.
C. Funding decision - Mr. Long indicated that it had been over two years since the original proposals were submitted and that a decision on how or if to fund this project was in order. He had taken the liberty of asking El Paso if there was interest in funding ½ the phase I costs, since they had an interest in the Carbozyme technology for removing CO2 from their methane sources. He was awaiting a reply. He also indicated that Oxy was interested in loaning the funds with a guarantee from the cement companies. Mr. Long was unclear as to what positive steps were being taken to secure state or federal funds. The long delay to move forward or make any decision as to a schedule for funds was in the opinion of Mr. Long unfair to the two selected technology companies.
D. Meeting with other cement plants was on hold pending any significant decision on moving forward with this project.
E. Press release is still on hold.
9. Cal Port Co-operative Projects
d. Electron Beam – Long reported that there was still interest by Hadley and Aldrich and that the cost of a demonstration remained in the $200,000 range. He reminded the Board that the concept was to jointly fund the project with Cal Port, with Mr. Biggs to raise the issue with the Mike Robertson the Plant Manager at Cal Port. There had been a 5-month delay in contacting Mr. Robertson. Mr. Sheets asked if there was interest on the part of the consulting group, why they were not interested in funding the demonstration. Mr. Long replied that the company would be putting in a significant contribution, but that the arrangement as discussed provided for CIEC to retain some financial interest in the technology if we were to arrange for funding.
e. CKD Weathering – The staff at Lawrence Livermore is continuing to work with Cal Port of this project.
f. Biosolids – Cal Port is interested in looking at use of biosolids as a fuel and is expected to participate in any meetings.
10. Old. New Business – None
11. Next Meeting - To be determined based in part on the Executive Officer selection process.
TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE
CANCELLED
Southern California Edison Offices
12353 Hesperia Road
Victorville, CA
CIEC Contact Information. comprar sildenafil sin receta.
email: webmaster@cieconline.net